Resolutions

Unified Intercarrier Compensation Scheme – 2001-01

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE UTILITY CONSUMER ADVOCATES RESOLUTION Authorizing NASUCA to Respond to the FCC’s Proposed Unified Intercarrier Compensation Scheme That Would Shift Additional Access Charges to Consumers WHEREAS, on April 27, 2001, the Federal Communications Commission released a Notice [...]

July 17th, 2001|Categories: Telecommunications|

Open access to cable facilities – 2000-04

Authorizing the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates to support open access to cable facilities used to provide telecommunications services. WHEREAS, The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has determined that the transmission of traffic between [...]

November 14th, 2000|Categories: Telecommunications|

Lifeline and Linkup Benefits – 2000-05

Requesting the FCC to Allow Consumers to Qualify for Lifeline and Linkup Benefits Based upon Their Low Income Status under the Federal Regulations WHEREAS, universal service has been accepted as a national goal so that all consumers may enjoy affordable [...]

November 14th, 2000|Categories: Telecommunications|

Usefulness of the Uniform Business Practices – 2000-07

Regarding the Usefulness of the Uniform Business Practices Manual For State Regulatory Agencies WHEREAS, A coalition of four industry groups; the Edison Electric Institute (EEI), the Coalition for Uniform Business Rules (CUBR), the National Energy Marketers Association (NEMA) and the [...]

November 14th, 2000|Categories: Gas|

Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) service – 2000-02

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE UTILITY CONSUMER ADVOCATES RESOLUTION Authorizing the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates to support a monthly recurring charge for the high frequency portion of the loop as utilized in the provision of digital subscriber line [...]

June 7th, 2000|Categories: Telecommunications|

Internal Revenue Code Normalization – 2000-01

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE UTILITY CONSUMER ADVOCATES RESOLUTION Requesting Congress to clarify applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code to provide that the normalization rules set forth therein are not violated when the benefits of unamortized investment tax credits and [...]

April 1st, 2000|Categories: Electric|
Go to Top